HSTC.L vs. AFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).
HSTC.L and AFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HSTC.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC Investment Funds (Luxembourg) S.A. that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Dec 9, 2020. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both HSTC.L and AFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HSTC.L or AFTY.
Key characteristics
| HSTC.L | AFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.87% | 20.72% |
| 1Y Return | 8.80% | 15.89% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.89% | -6.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.62 | 1.50 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.13 | 0.28 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.51 | 2.61 |
| Ulcer Index | 17.26% | 5.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.17% | 20.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.93% | -51.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -55.44% | -36.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSTC.L and AFTY is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HSTC.L achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly lower than AFTY's 20.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSTC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
HSTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.85%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSTC.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 101.85% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 8.63% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
Drawdowns
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, which is greater than AFTY's maximum drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTC.L and AFTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HSTC.L vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 15.78% compared to Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) at 0.75%. This indicates that HSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.