PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSRT vs. HQGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSRT vs. HQGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HSRT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HQGO

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.79%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. HQGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HSRT
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
0.00%0.60%6.44%1.34%
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
10.17%15.15%25.09%6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HSRT and HQGO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSRT vs. HQGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSRT

HQGO
HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSRT vs. HQGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HSRT vs. HQGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSRTHQGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

Drawdowns

HSRT vs. HQGO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSRTHQGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

Volatility

HSRT vs. HQGO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSRTHQGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

HSRT vs. HQGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HQGO's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSRT vs. HQGO - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
0.46%0.51%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSRT
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
0.00%1.29%6.37%3.98%2.67%2.23%2.88%3.50%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSRT and HQGO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.

HQGO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

HSRT is categorized as CLO, while HQGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. HSRT tracks JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index, while HQGO tracks Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.34% for HQGO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSRT and HQGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer