HSRT vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSRT is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index, while FLRT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Pacific Life. HSRT is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

HSRT vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HSRT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRT

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	0.60%	6.44%	7.52%	-4.40%	0.58%	3.77%	6.95%	0.40%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.66%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	-2.72%	3.18%	2.78%	9.44%	-2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HSRT and FLRT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018	0.15

Return for Risk

HSRT vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSRT vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSRT	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.75	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HSRT	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.32%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.41%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSRT	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	2.30%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	6.17%	—

HSRT vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSRT vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.82%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	1.29%	6.37%	3.98%	2.67%	2.23%	2.88%	3.50%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSRT and FLRT in my portfolio?

HSRT and FLRT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSRT or FLRT?

On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSRT or FLRT?

HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSRT or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.82%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

What is the main difference between HSRT and FLRT?

HSRT is categorized as CLO, while FLRT is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.69% for FLRT.