HSRT vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. HSRT is passively managed, while AAAC is actively managed. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

HSRT vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HSRT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	0.00%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Return for Risk

HSRT vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSRT	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	5.56	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HSRT	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSRT	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.89%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.89%	—

HSRT vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSRT vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	1.29%	6.37%	3.98%	2.67%	2.23%	2.88%	3.50%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HSRT or AAAC?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSRT or AAAC?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HSRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSRT or AAAC?

AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

What is the main difference between HSRT and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.20% for AAAC.