PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPGX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HSPGX

1D
1.59%
1M
7.31%
YTD
26.02%
6M
24.44%
1Y
68.10%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
16.13%

UMBHX

1D
2.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and UMBHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.39

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.79

-1.35

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPGXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.28%

-1.86%

-58.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-0.84%

-18.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPGXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.33%

30.30%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

30.30%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.13%

30.30%

-5.17%

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSPGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
10.11%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSPGX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPGX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer