HSPGX vs. EFCNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) and EFCNX (Emerald Insights Fund) are both mutual funds - HSPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Emerald, while EFCNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Emerald. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX returned 16.13%/yr vs 16.46%/yr for EFCNX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for EFCNX.

Performance

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HSPGX having a 16.13% annualized return and EFCNX not far ahead at 16.46%.

HSPGX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 7.31%
• YTD: 26.02%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 68.10%
• 3Y*: 32.40%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

EFCNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 16.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	26.02%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	28.33%	-12.16%	27.72%
EFCNX Emerald Insights Fund	0.00%	28.71%	25.88%	40.82%	-31.09%	22.95%	49.60%	36.32%	-9.88%	22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and EFCNX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2014	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between HSPGX and EFCNX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. EFCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 82
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EFCNX

EFCNX Risk / Return Rank: 99
EFCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EFCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EFCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EFCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EFCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSPGX	EFCNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	3.86	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	6.20	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	2.65	-1.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	12.23	-7.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.39	70.23	-48.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the EFCNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPGX and EFCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSPGX	EFCNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	3.86	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.50	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.74	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.63	-0.19

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than EFCNX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and EFCNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPGX	EFCNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.28%	-38.34%	-21.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-2.90%	-11.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.63%	-27.61%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.65%	-38.34%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	-38.34%	-3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.01%	-8.64%	-10.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	0.94%	+2.45%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSPGX	EFCNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	0.00%	+7.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	0.00%	+19.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.33%	9.27%	+16.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	22.89%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.13%	22.80%	+2.33%

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EFCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSPGX vs. EFCNX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, more than EFCNX's 8.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFCNX Emerald Insights Fund	8.50%	8.50%	1.27%	0.00%	5.41%	15.80%	9.41%	0.04%	27.51%
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	10.11%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPGX and EFCNX in my portfolio?

HSPGX and EFCNX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSPGX or EFCNX?

HSPGX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to EFCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSPGX dropped -60.28% vs EFCNX's -38.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.