HSPGX vs. OBMCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) and OBMCX (Oberweis Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX returned 16.13%/yr vs 21.63%/yr for OBMCX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for OBMCX.

Performance

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly lower than OBMCX's 45.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX has underperformed OBMCX with an annualized return of 16.13%, while OBMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.63% annualized return.

HSPGX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 7.31%
• YTD: 26.02%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 68.10%
• 3Y*: 32.40%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

OBMCX

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 45.67%
• 6M: 45.60%
• 1Y: 77.10%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 19.97%
• 10Y*: 21.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	26.02%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	28.33%	-12.16%	27.72%
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund	45.67%	14.70%	22.82%	18.87%	-10.57%	53.20%	29.91%	21.94%	-12.04%	27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and OBMCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1996	0.85

The correlation between HSPGX and OBMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 82
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

OBMCX

OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSPGX	OBMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	3.24	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.90	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.51	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	6.47	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.39	25.98	-4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the OBMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPGX and OBMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSPGX	OBMCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	3.24	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.77	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.84	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.45	-0.01

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, smaller than the maximum OBMCX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and OBMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPGX	OBMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.28%	-68.24%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-12.45%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.63%	-28.11%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.65%	-28.11%	-10.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	-50.04%	+8.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.01%	-16.42%	-2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	3.09%	+0.30%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) is 7.62%, while Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that HSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSPGX	OBMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	8.26%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	18.66%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.33%	24.89%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	26.20%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.13%	25.88%	-0.75%

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSPGX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, more than OBMCX's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	10.11%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund	0.97%	1.41%	2.53%	0.00%	1.37%	24.35%	0.00%	0.00%	19.67%	11.76%	0.05%	3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPGX and OBMCX in my portfolio?

HSPGX and OBMCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSPGX or OBMCX?

OBMCX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to HSPGX (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSPGX dropped -60.28% vs OBMCX's -68.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.