PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBMCX vs. BFGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBMCX achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 11.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OBMCX having a 22.03% annualized return and BFGFX not far behind at 21.92%.


OBMCX

1D
2.68%
1M
6.77%
YTD
50.06%
6M
45.35%
1Y
81.20%
3Y*
29.33%
5Y*
20.91%
10Y*
22.03%

BFGFX

1D
-0.76%
1M
12.63%
YTD
11.20%
6M
8.27%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
21.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
50.06%14.70%22.82%18.87%-10.57%53.20%29.91%21.94%-12.04%27.90%
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
11.20%21.94%29.52%27.40%-28.21%18.67%122.38%30.05%3.76%26.36%

Correlation

The correlation between OBMCX and BFGFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between OBMCX and BFGFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBMCX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBMCX
OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGFX
BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OBMCXBFGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.34

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

3.46

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.93

9.28

+16.65

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBMCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBMCX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than BFGFX's maximum drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBMCX and BFGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBMCXBFGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-59.52%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-9.74%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-21.00%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.11%

-35.93%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.04%

-43.62%

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.92%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.39%

-12.34%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.63%

-0.49%

Volatility

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) have volatilities of 10.07% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBMCXBFGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

9.75%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.24%

14.32%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

21.03%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

22.66%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.00%

24.15%

+1.85%

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBMCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

OBMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.28%15.53%2.85%1.78%1.07%2.11%6.02%5.80%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
0.94%1.41%2.53%0.00%1.37%24.35%0.00%0.00%19.67%11.76%0.05%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBMCX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBMCX has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to BFGFX (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBMCX dropped -68.24% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBMCX and BFGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer