OBMCX vs. BFGFX
OBMCX (Oberweis Micro Cap Fund) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - OBMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Oberweis, while BFGFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. Over the past 10 years, OBMCX returned 22.03%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for BFGFX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBMCX charges 1.48%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BFGFX.
Performance
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBMCX achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 11.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OBMCX having a 22.03% annualized return and BFGFX not far behind at 21.92%.
OBMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 6.77%
- YTD
- 50.06%
- 6M
- 45.35%
- 1Y
- 81.20%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.91%
- 10Y*
- 22.03%
BFGFX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 33.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- 21.92%
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 50.06% | 14.70% | 22.82% | 18.87% | -10.57% | 53.20% | 29.91% | 21.94% | -12.04% | 27.90% |
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | 11.20% | 21.94% | 29.52% | 27.40% | -28.21% | 18.67% | 122.38% | 30.05% | 3.76% | 26.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBMCX and BFGFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OBMCX and BFGFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBMCX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
OBMCX
BFGFX
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OBMCX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.55 | 3.46 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.93 | 9.28 | +16.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than BFGFX's maximum drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBMCX and BFGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBMCX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -59.52% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -9.74% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -21.00% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.11% | -35.93% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.04% | -43.62% | -6.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.92% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -12.34% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.63% | -0.49% |
Volatility
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) have volatilities of 10.07% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBMCX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 9.75% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 14.32% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.06% | 21.03% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 22.66% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.00% | 24.15% | +1.85% |
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBMCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBMCX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison
OBMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.28% | 15.53% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.11% | 6.02% | 5.80% |
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 0.94% | 1.41% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 24.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.67% | 11.76% | 0.05% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBMCX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBMCX has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to BFGFX (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBMCX dropped -68.24% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.
OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBMCX and BFGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer