HSSAX vs. RMBKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX).
HSSAX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Feb 18, 1997. RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999.
Performance
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSSAX Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund | -12.92% | 12.11% | 16.47% | 15.58% | -55.87% | 38.83% | 11.94% | 20.55% | -19.86% | 12.63% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSSAX achieves a -12.92% return, which is significantly lower than RMBKX's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HSSAX has underperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 3.11%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
HSSAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -12.92%
- 6M
- -13.79%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- -9.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSSAX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HSSAX vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank
HSSAX
RMBKX
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSSAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.85 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 1.28 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 1.48 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 4.29 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSSAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.85 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.24 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.36 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between HSSAX and RMBKX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison
HSSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSSAX Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.56% | 2.83% | 0.00% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSSAX drawdown since its inception was -73.01%, which is greater than RMBKX's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSSAX and RMBKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSSAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.01% | -55.45% | -17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.61% | -12.67% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.01% | -44.33% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.01% | -55.45% | -17.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.79% | -8.06% | -46.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -11.19% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 4.38% | +3.52% |
Volatility
HSSAX vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison
Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) at 4.82%. This indicates that HSSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HSSAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 4.82% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.12% | 15.55% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 24.42% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.49% | 24.97% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 27.10% | +1.04% |