HSPGX vs. GPSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) and GPSCX (Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for GPSCX.

Performance

HSPGX vs. GPSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HSPGX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 7.31%
• YTD: 26.02%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 68.10%
• 3Y*: 32.40%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

GPSCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. GPSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	26.02%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	28.33%	-12.16%	27.72%
GPSCX Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund	0.00%	-13.27%	24.26%	7.27%	-37.24%	-7.96%	37.80%	38.52%	-8.92%	37.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and GPSCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998	0.91

The correlation between HSPGX and GPSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. GPSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 82
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. GPSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSPGX	GPSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.39	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSPGX	GPSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPGX	GPSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.01%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSPGX	GPSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.13%	—	—

HSPGX vs. GPSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GPSCX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSPGX vs. GPSCX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, while GPSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPSCX Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund	0.00%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	11.02%	24.10%	22.25%	11.69%	33.03%	5.00%	0.00%	40.41%
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	10.11%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPGX and GPSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HSPGX and GPSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.