GPSCX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
GPSCX is managed by Victory Capital. It was launched on May 1, 1997. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPSCX or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between GPSCX and VB is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GPSCX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GPSCX:
1.09
VB:
1.07
GPSCX:
1.60
VB:
1.55
GPSCX:
1.19
VB:
1.19
GPSCX:
0.36
VB:
2.03
GPSCX:
5.89
VB:
4.83
GPSCX:
4.18%
VB:
3.71%
GPSCX:
22.50%
VB:
16.83%
GPSCX:
-73.43%
VB:
-59.57%
GPSCX:
-59.80%
VB:
-5.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPSCX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 2.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GPSCX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of -6.95%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
GPSCX
-0.59%
-0.30%
14.37%
21.14%
-10.02%
-6.95%
VB
2.71%
3.64%
11.94%
15.53%
9.38%
9.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPSCX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPSCX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPSCX vs. VB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GPSCX
VB
GPSCX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPSCX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
GPSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPSCX Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
GPSCX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPSCX drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSCX and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPSCX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.93%. This indicates that GPSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.