HSMV vs. RYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSMV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. HSMV is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSMV returned 4.65%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for RYLD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

HSMV vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 9.51% return.

HSMV

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: —

RYLD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: 2.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSMV vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF	6.36%	1.57%	13.17%	5.01%	-9.44%	23.72%	34.70%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	9.51%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-13.03%	22.13%	44.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and RYLD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2020	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between HSMV and RYLD has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HSMV vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSMV	RYLD
Real Estate	24.3%	5.9%
Financial Services	16.7%	15.5%
Industrials	14.6%	18.0%
Utilities	11.7%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	2.3%
Basic Materials	5.8%	4.7%
Healthcare	4.7%	16.3%
Energy	2.8%	5.4%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.4%
Technology	1.9%	19.0%

Return for Risk

HSMV vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSMV

HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 20
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSMV vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSMV	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.96	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	2.76	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.41	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	3.31	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	13.37	-10.79

HSMV vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSMV and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSMV	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-41.53%	+22.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-6.29%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-19.05%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.16%	-21.33%	+2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-0.50%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	-8.78%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	1.55%	+1.08%

Volatility

HSMV vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.00%. This indicates that HSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSMV	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	2.00%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	7.80%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	10.66%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	14.05%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.15%	-1.12%

HSMV vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSMV vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than RYLD's 11.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF	1.94%	2.01%	1.43%	1.43%	1.26%	0.76%	0.80%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.73%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSMV and RYLD in my portfolio?

HSMV and RYLD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSMV or RYLD?

HSMV has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to RYLD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, HSMV or RYLD?

On 5-year performance, HSMV leads with 4.65% vs 2.45% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HSMV or RYLD?

Over the 5-year period, HSMV has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSMV or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSMV or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 1.94% for HSMV.

What is the main difference between HSMV and RYLD?

HSMV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.