HSCZ vs. NISM
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and NISM (NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. HSCZ is passively managed, while NISM is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NISM.
Performance
HSCZ vs. NISM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HSCZ
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
NISM
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSCZ vs. NISM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 1.36% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | -2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and NISM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. NISM — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
NISM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HSCZ vs. NISM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. NISM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, which is greater than NISM's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and NISM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -4.35% | -30.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -2.77% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -1.75% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. NISM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 14.27% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 14.27% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 14.27% | +1.06% |
HSCZ vs. NISM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NISM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. NISM - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than NISM's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 3.14% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and NISM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NISM.
HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.25% for NISM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.70% for NISM.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and NISM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer