HSCZ vs. IXC
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ returned 12.54%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for IXC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
HSCZ vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 12.54%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
HSCZ vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.35% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 22.29% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and IXC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.43 |
The correlation between HSCZ and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HSCZ vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
IXC
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
HSCZ
IXC
-
Financial Services
HSCZ
IXC
-
Technology
HSCZ
IXC
-
Real Estate
HSCZ
IXC
-
Basic Materials
HSCZ
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
IXC
-
Energy
HSCZ
IXC
Healthcare
HSCZ
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
IXC
-
Communication Services
HSCZ
IXC
-
Utilities
HSCZ
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
IXC
HSCZ vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.28 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.40 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 8.40 | +3.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -67.88% | +32.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -13.31% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -19.06% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -24.93% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -64.16% | +29.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -11.99% | +10.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -17.46% | +12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.80% | -1.55% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.94%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 6.54% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 15.76% | -6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 19.16% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 23.48% | -9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 26.83% | -11.36% |
HSCZ vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than IXC's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.11% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and IXC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to HSCZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 12.54% vs 9.38% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 2.95% for HSCZ.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.40% for IXC.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer