PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSCZ vs. IGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than IGRO's 7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has outperformed IGRO with an annualized return of 12.35%, while IGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.


HSCZ

1D
0.71%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.18%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.35%

IGRO

1D
0.23%
1M
0.89%
YTD
7.79%
6M
9.17%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.99%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
7.79%25.03%7.78%15.38%-12.72%9.94%7.71%26.13%-14.86%24.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HSCZ and IGRO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.69

The correlation between HSCZ and IGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSCZ
IGRO

Industrials

24.4%
14.4%

Financial Services

13.3%
32.0%

Technology

10.8%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
6.8%

Basic Materials

10.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

9.5%
0.6%

Healthcare

4.8%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
10.1%

Energy

3.8%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.1%
1.9%

Utilities

2.4%
6.9%

Industrials

HSCZ
24.4%
IGRO
14.4%

Financial Services

HSCZ
13.3%
IGRO
32.0%

Technology

HSCZ
10.8%
IGRO
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HSCZ
10.8%
IGRO
6.8%

Basic Materials

HSCZ
10.8%
IGRO
3.5%

Real Estate

HSCZ
9.5%
IGRO
0.6%

Healthcare

HSCZ
4.8%
IGRO
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

HSCZ
3.9%
IGRO
10.1%

Energy

HSCZ
3.8%
IGRO
2.4%

Communication Services

HSCZ
3.1%
IGRO
1.9%

Utilities

HSCZ
2.4%
IGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSCZ vs. IGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IGRO
IGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSCZIGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.39

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

5.17

+7.40

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSCZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the IGRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSCZ and IGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IGRO drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and IGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSCZIGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.89%

-36.25%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-10.00%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-11.13%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-26.04%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

-36.25%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.02%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-5.67%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.70%

-0.45%

Volatility

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) at 3.59%. This indicates that HSCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSCZIGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.59%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

10.65%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

12.71%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

13.95%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

16.85%

-1.17%

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IGRO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSCZ vs. IGRO - Dividend Comparison

HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than IGRO's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.93%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.36%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSCZ and IGRO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSCZ has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to IGRO (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs IGRO's -36.25%.

On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 12.35% vs 9.08% for IGRO. On fees, IGRO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGRO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.36% for IGRO.

HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IGRO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IGRO tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.15% for IGRO.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSCZ and IGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer