PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSCZ vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 17.58% return.


HSCZ

1D
0.71%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.18%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.35%

FSMD

1D
1.00%
1M
4.34%
YTD
17.58%
6M
15.58%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.99%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%14.81%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.58%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HSCZ and FSMD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.74

The correlation between HSCZ and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSCZ
FSMD

Industrials

24.4%
20.1%

Financial Services

13.3%
14.8%

Technology

10.8%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.6%

Basic Materials

10.8%
4.0%

Real Estate

9.5%
6.2%

Healthcare

4.8%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.1%

Energy

3.8%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Industrials

HSCZ
24.4%
FSMD
20.1%

Financial Services

HSCZ
13.3%
FSMD
14.8%

Technology

HSCZ
10.8%
FSMD
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HSCZ
10.8%
FSMD
10.6%

Basic Materials

HSCZ
10.8%
FSMD
4.0%

Real Estate

HSCZ
9.5%
FSMD
6.2%

Healthcare

HSCZ
4.8%
FSMD
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

HSCZ
3.9%
FSMD
3.1%

Energy

HSCZ
3.8%
FSMD
4.1%

Communication Services

HSCZ
3.1%
FSMD
2.9%

Utilities

HSCZ
2.4%
FSMD
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSCZ vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSCZFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.31

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.30

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

11.89

+0.69

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSCZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSCZ and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, smaller than the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSCZFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.89%

-40.67%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-8.44%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-22.16%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-22.16%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-5.98%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.34%

-0.09%

Volatility

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 4.08%, while Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSCZFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.14%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

11.85%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

15.69%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

18.55%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

21.43%

-5.75%

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSCZ vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than FSMD's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.18%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.93%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSCZ and FSMD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMD has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

On 5-year performance, HSCZ leads with 10.94% vs 10.00% for FSMD. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.18% for FSMD.

HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FSMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.29% for FSMD.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSCZ and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer