HSCZ vs. DGRO
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ returned 12.54%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for DGRO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 12.54%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.35% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.19% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and DGRO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between HSCZ and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
DGRO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
HSCZ
DGRO
Financial Services
HSCZ
DGRO
Technology
HSCZ
DGRO
Real Estate
HSCZ
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
HSCZ
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
DGRO
Energy
HSCZ
DGRO
Healthcare
HSCZ
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
DGRO
Communication Services
HSCZ
DGRO
Utilities
HSCZ
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
DGRO
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.45 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 13.31 | -1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -35.10% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -6.47% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -14.03% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -19.31% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -35.10% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.90% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -3.43% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.67% | +0.58% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that HSCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 2.63% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 6.94% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 9.53% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 13.80% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 16.60% | -1.13% |
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than DGRO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSCZ has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.62% vs 12.54% for HSCZ. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 12.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.
HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.97% for DGRO.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.08% for DGRO.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer