HRTVX vs. NSVAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX).
HRTVX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Dec 28, 1984. NSVAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on May 1, 2002.
Performance
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 7.35% | 15.94% | 15.76% | 17.15% | -10.04% | 21.86% | 13.12% | 17.93% | -12.10% | 8.45% |
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II | 5.24% | 8.20% | 11.25% | 14.10% | -13.70% | 34.27% | 10.11% | 20.65% | -17.48% | 10.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRTVX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than NSVAX's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX has outperformed NSVAX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while NSVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.
HRTVX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 31.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
NSVAX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRTVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than NSVAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRTVX vs. NSVAX — Risk / Return Rank
HRTVX
NSVAX
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRTVX | NSVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.14 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.70 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.74 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 6.73 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRTVX | NSVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.14 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.29 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.40 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRTVX and NSVAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Dividend Comparison
HRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, less than NSVAX's 15.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 8.65% | 9.29% | 8.91% | 5.65% | 3.01% | 13.50% | 0.76% | 3.12% | 7.26% | 6.43% | 3.56% | 8.25% |
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II | 15.10% | 15.89% | 29.38% | 6.93% | 6.46% | 13.95% | 0.83% | 3.68% | 14.97% | 9.10% | 5.23% | 12.66% |
Drawdowns
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRTVX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, roughly equal to the maximum NSVAX drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTVX and NSVAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRTVX | NSVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -59.32% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -14.17% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.17% | -27.11% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.31% | -48.33% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -5.89% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -9.80% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.67% | -0.13% |
Volatility
HRTVX vs. NSVAX - Volatility Comparison
Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) have volatilities of 6.14% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRTVX | NSVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 6.18% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 12.47% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 21.72% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 22.56% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 23.87% | -2.85% |