HRTVX vs. PCFAX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HRTVX (Heartland Value Fund) and PCFAX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX returned 11.76%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for PCFAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HRTVX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for PCFAX.

Performance

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HRTVX having a 20.04% return and PCFAX slightly lower at 19.62%. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX has underperformed PCFAX with an annualized return of 11.76%, while PCFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

HRTVX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 6M: 21.69%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 22.75%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

PCFAX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 19.62%
• 6M: 17.75%
• 1Y: 38.84%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund	20.04%	15.94%	15.76%	17.15%	-10.04%	21.86%	13.12%	17.93%	-12.10%	8.45%
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	19.62%	6.44%	20.44%	17.64%	-12.75%	38.96%	9.25%	21.17%	-12.42%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HRTVX and PCFAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014	0.91

The correlation between HRTVX and PCFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HRTVX vs. PCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTVX

HRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 78
HRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
HRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PCFAX

PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HRTVX	PCFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.26	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.18	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	4.50	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.31	14.55	+0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the PCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTVX and PCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HRTVX	PCFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.26	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.38	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.54	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.45	+0.14

Drawdowns

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTVX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than PCFAX's maximum drawdown of -52.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTVX and PCFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRTVX	PCFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.68%	-52.29%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-8.94%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	-28.18%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.17%	-28.91%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.31%	-52.29%	+5.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-9.11%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.76%	-0.01%

Volatility

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) is 4.45%, while PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that HRTVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRTVX	PCFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	5.57%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	12.35%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	17.84%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.51%	23.19%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	24.87%	-3.84%

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PCFAX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRTVX vs. PCFAX - Dividend Comparison

HRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than PCFAX's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund	7.74%	9.29%	8.91%	5.65%	3.01%	13.50%	0.76%	3.12%	7.26%	6.43%	3.56%	8.25%
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	2.49%	2.26%	6.30%	1.99%	13.66%	235.35%	18.04%	2.29%	12.48%	8.98%	0.00%	26.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRTVX and PCFAX in my portfolio?

HRTVX and PCFAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRTVX or PCFAX?

PCFAX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to HRTVX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTVX dropped -61.68% vs PCFAX's -52.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.