PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSVAX vs. FSCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSVAX achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than FSCRX's 18.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NSVAX having a 10.61% annualized return and FSCRX not far behind at 10.58%.


NSVAX

1D
-5.12%
1M
0.13%
YTD
15.13%
6M
13.35%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
10.61%

FSCRX

1D
1.05%
1M
6.29%
YTD
18.79%
6M
16.69%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
15.13%8.20%11.25%14.10%-13.70%34.27%10.11%20.65%-17.48%10.46%
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
18.79%10.89%2.75%21.28%-16.68%35.66%6.87%27.31%-14.06%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NSVAX and FSCRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002

0.94

The correlation between NSVAX and FSCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSVAX vs. FSCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSVAX
NSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCRX
FSCRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FSCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSVAXFSCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.19

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

10.54

+1.65

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FSCRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSVAX and FSCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than FSCRX's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSVAX and FSCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSVAXFSCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-56.27%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-11.34%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.11%

-22.51%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-25.91%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.33%

-47.06%

-1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

0.00%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-7.91%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.43%

-0.70%

Volatility

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) at 6.89%. This indicates that NSVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSVAXFSCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

6.89%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

14.15%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

18.71%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

20.32%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

21.79%

+2.17%

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSVAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCRX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSVAX vs. FSCRX - Dividend Comparison

NSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%, less than FSCRX's 12.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
12.74%14.70%13.03%4.44%11.56%6.12%2.79%7.46%35.48%13.68%0.44%7.28%
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
10.03%15.89%29.38%6.93%6.46%13.95%0.83%3.68%14.97%9.10%5.23%12.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSVAX and FSCRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSVAX has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to FSCRX (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSVAX dropped -59.32% vs FSCRX's -56.27%.

FSCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSVAX and FSCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer