NSVAX vs. CMTFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NSVAX (Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II) and CMTFX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NSVAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while CMTFX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, NSVAX returned 10.36%/yr vs 24.93%/yr for CMTFX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NSVAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for CMTFX.

Performance

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSVAX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 31.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NSVAX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.93% annualized return.

NSVAX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 16.52%
• 1Y: 35.98%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 10.36%

CMTFX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 14.23%
• YTD: 31.13%
• 6M: 30.09%
• 1Y: 59.88%
• 3Y*: 36.05%
• 5Y*: 20.64%
• 10Y*: 24.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II	16.33%	8.20%	11.25%	14.10%	-13.70%	34.27%	10.11%	20.65%	-17.48%	10.46%
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund	31.13%	25.10%	31.72%	56.85%	-34.63%	23.04%	49.65%	44.21%	-1.26%	43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NSVAX and CMTFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2002	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between NSVAX and CMTFX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NSVAX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSVAX

NSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
NSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CMTFX

CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSVAX	CMTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.91	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.56	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	4.27	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	15.98	-3.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSVAX and CMTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSVAX	CMTFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.91	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.80	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	1.01	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.50	-0.05

Drawdowns

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSVAX and CMTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSVAX	CMTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.32%	-68.28%	+8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-14.35%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.11%	-26.63%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.11%	-39.42%	+12.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.33%	-39.42%	-8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.80%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-16.29%	+6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	3.82%	-1.10%

Volatility

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) is 4.59%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that NSVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSVAX	CMTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	6.55%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	16.75%	-5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	21.07%	-3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.43%	25.98%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	24.84%	-0.95%

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSVAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSVAX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison

NSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, more than CMTFX's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund	2.36%	3.09%	1.02%	2.23%	3.36%	4.19%	0.87%	2.44%	5.89%	3.60%	0.35%	1.74%
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II	13.66%	15.89%	29.38%	6.93%	6.46%	13.95%	0.83%	3.68%	14.97%	9.10%	5.23%	12.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSVAX and CMTFX in my portfolio?

NSVAX and CMTFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSVAX or CMTFX?

CMTFX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to NSVAX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSVAX dropped -59.32% vs CMTFX's -68.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.