HRTVX vs. XMVM
Compare and contrast key facts about Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM).
HRTVX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Dec 28, 1984. XMVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 4.83% | 15.94% | 15.76% | 17.15% | -10.04% | 21.86% | 13.12% | 17.93% | -12.10% | 8.45% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.15% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRTVX achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 10.76%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.
HRTVX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
XMVM
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRTVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRTVX vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
HRTVX
XMVM
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRTVX | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.85 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.96 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 7.24 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRTVX | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRTVX and XMVM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
HRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, more than XMVM's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 8.86% | 9.29% | 8.91% | 5.65% | 3.01% | 13.50% | 0.76% | 3.12% | 7.26% | 6.43% | 3.56% | 8.25% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.07% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRTVX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTVX and XMVM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRTVX | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -62.83% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -13.61% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.17% | -24.12% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.31% | -45.07% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -6.32% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -10.34% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.68% | -0.16% |
Volatility
HRTVX vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 4.49%. This indicates that HRTVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRTVX | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 4.49% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 11.40% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 20.97% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 21.79% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 22.81% | -1.80% |