HRTS vs. DSPY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) and DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) are both exchange-traded funds - HRTS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while DSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HRTS returned 25.88% vs 24.61% for DSPY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HRTS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DSPY.

Performance

HRTS vs. DSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than DSPY's 11.15% return.

HRTS

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: -1.45%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DSPY

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 24.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTS vs. DSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	-1.45%	21.98%
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	11.15%	18.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and DSPY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.54

The correlation between HRTS and DSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

HRTS vs. DSPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HRTS	DSPY
Healthcare	100.0%	10.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	3.7%
Financial Services	-	14.1%
Industrials	-	9.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Technology	-	32.4%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

HRTS vs. DSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS

HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 48
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

DSPY

DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 73
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTS vs. DSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HRTS	DSPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.11	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.89	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	3.28	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.70	14.69	-9.00

HRTS vs. DSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the DSPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTS and DSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. DSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, which is greater than DSPY's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and DSPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRTS	DSPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.81%	-12.15%	-13.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.01%	-7.55%	-3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-1.71%	-3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	-1.25%	-7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	1.68%	+2.87%

Volatility

HRTS vs. DSPY - Volatility Comparison

Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) at 4.52%. This indicates that HRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRTS	DSPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	4.52%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	9.32%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	11.77%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.08%	16.60%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.08%	16.60%	+2.48%

HRTS vs. DSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DSPY's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRTS vs. DSPY - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than DSPY's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	0.75%	0.72%	0.00%
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	1.36%	1.34%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRTS and DSPY in my portfolio?

HRTS and DSPY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRTS or DSPY?

HRTS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DSPY (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTS dropped -25.81% vs DSPY's -12.15%.

Which ETF is better, HRTS or DSPY?

On 1-year performance, HRTS leads with 25.88% vs 24.61% for DSPY. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HRTS or DSPY?

Over the 1-year period, HRTS has performed better with a 25.88% return vs 24.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HRTS or DSPY?

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HRTS or DSPY?

HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.75% for DSPY.

What is the main difference between HRTS and DSPY?

HRTS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DSPY is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HRTS and 0.18% for DSPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.