PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRTS vs. DSPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRTS vs. DSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than DSPY's 12.26% return.


HRTS

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-5.70%
6M
-5.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DSPY

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.59%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.63%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTS vs. DSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and DSPY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.57

The correlation between HRTS and DSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

HRTS vs. DSPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HRTS
DSPY

Healthcare

100.0%
10.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Communication Services

-

7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Energy

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

14.2%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

-

28.8%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Healthcare

HRTS
100.0%
DSPY
10.6%

Basic Materials

HRTS

-

DSPY
2.3%

Communication Services

HRTS

-

DSPY
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HRTS

-

DSPY
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

HRTS

-

DSPY
6.4%

Energy

HRTS

-

DSPY
4.4%

Financial Services

HRTS

-

DSPY
14.2%

Industrials

HRTS

-

DSPY
10.8%

Real Estate

HRTS

-

DSPY
2.5%

Technology

HRTS

-

DSPY
28.8%

Utilities

HRTS

-

DSPY
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRTS vs. DSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DSPY
DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTS vs. DSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRTSDSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.57

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

16.34

-11.52

HRTS vs. DSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the DSPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTS and DSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRTSDSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.41

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.68

-1.13

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. DSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, which is greater than DSPY's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and DSPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRTSDSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-12.15%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-7.55%

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-0.36%

-8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-1.25%

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

1.64%

+2.72%

Volatility

HRTS vs. DSPY - Volatility Comparison

Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) at 2.82%. This indicates that HRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRTSDSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

2.82%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

8.52%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

11.21%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.53%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.53%

+2.54%

HRTS vs. DSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DSPY's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRTS vs. DSPY - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than DSPY's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
0.74%0.72%0.00%
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.42%1.34%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRTS and DSPY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRTS has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DSPY (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTS dropped -25.81% vs DSPY's -12.15%.

On 1-year performance, DSPY leads with 26.81% vs 20.97% for HRTS. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DSPY has performed better with a 26.81% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.

HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.74% for DSPY.

HRTS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DSPY is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HRTS and 0.18% for DSPY.

DSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRTS and DSPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer