DSPY vs. SCHX
DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DSPY is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past year, DSPY returned 24.61% vs 23.07% for SCHX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
DSPY vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.04% return.
DSPY
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
DSPY vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy | 11.15% | 18.94% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.04% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSPY and SCHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DSPY and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSPY vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSPY
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DSPY
SCHX
Financial Services
DSPY
SCHX
Healthcare
DSPY
SCHX
Industrials
DSPY
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
DSPY
SCHX
Communication Services
DSPY
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
DSPY
SCHX
Energy
DSPY
SCHX
Utilities
DSPY
SCHX
Real Estate
DSPY
SCHX
Basic Materials
DSPY
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSPY vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
DSPY
SCHX
DSPY vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSPY | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.57 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | 11.26 | +3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSPY vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSPY | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -34.33% | +22.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -9.02% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -3.11% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -3.96% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.05% | -0.37% |
Volatility
DSPY vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) is 4.52%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that DSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSPY | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.89% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.94% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 12.65% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 17.23% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 18.16% | -1.56% |
DSPY vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DSPY vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy | 0.75% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DSPY and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to DSPY (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 1-year performance, DSPY leads with 24.61% vs 23.07% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DSPY has performed better with a 24.61% return vs 23.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DSPY.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.75% for DSPY.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.03% for SCHX.
DSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSPY and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer