HRTG vs. LRN
HRTG (Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. HRTG operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, HRTG returned 7.50%/yr vs 23.80%/yr for LRN. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HRTG vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRTG achieves a -23.27% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 50.49% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTG has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 7.50%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.80% annualized return.
HRTG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -22.80%
- 1Y
- -5.99%
- 3Y*
- 71.00%
- 5Y*
- 22.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
LRN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- -31.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
HRTG vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTG Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. | -23.27% | 141.82% | 85.58% | 262.22% | -68.58% | -40.09% | -21.80% | -8.50% | -17.06% | 16.94% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 50.49% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRTG and LRN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2014 | 0.14 |
The correlation between HRTG and LRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HRTG:
$690.12M
LRN:
$4.65B
HRTG:
$6.53
LRN:
$9.68
HRTG:
3.44
LRN:
10.10
HRTG:
0.02
LRN:
0.25
HRTG:
0.82
LRN:
1.86
HRTG:
1.33
LRN:
2.83
HRTG:
$848.47M
LRN:
$2.54B
HRTG:
$333.64M
LRN:
$972.24M
HRTG:
$285.21M
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRTG vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
HRTG
LRN
HRTG vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HRTG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.49 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | -0.74 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HRTG vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRTG drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTG and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRTG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -81.41% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.95% | -64.07% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -64.07% | +20.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.89% | -64.07% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.21% | -64.07% | -28.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.91% | -42.46% | +14.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.51% | -36.27% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 42.11% | -27.19% |
Volatility
HRTG vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 8.21%. This indicates that HRTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRTG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 8.21% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.66% | 24.17% | +13.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.07% | 66.70% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.35% | 51.40% | +19.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.93% | 49.22% | +8.71% |
Dividends
HRTG vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither HRTG nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTG Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.67% | 4.08% | 2.37% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 0.23% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HRTG vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HRTG vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
HRTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 212.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
HRTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.82M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
HRTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 36.48M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HRTG and LRN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRTG has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to LRN (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTG dropped -94.36% vs LRN's -81.41%.
HRTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRTG and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer