HRMDX vs. CIMDX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX).

HRMDX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Oct 31, 2014. CIMDX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017.

Performance

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund	4.09%	0.12%	3.68%	13.37%	-3.09%	28.13%	6.93%	25.30%	-8.58%	7.86%
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	-4.82%	7.35%	5.67%	10.38%	-3.67%	6.23%	23.21%	23.74%	-7.85%	11.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRMDX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's -4.82% return.

HRMDX

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -7.79%
• YTD: 4.09%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 3.44%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 9.72%

CIMDX

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.39%
• YTD: -4.82%
• 6M: -2.41%
• 1Y: 3.41%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.

HRMDX

Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund

CIMDX

Clarkston Founders Fund

Return for Risk

HRMDX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRMDX

HRMDX Risk / Return Rank: 8
HRMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HRMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HRMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HRMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HRMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CIMDX

CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 8
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HRMDX	CIMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	0.17	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	0.40	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.05	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	0.32	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	1.00	+0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the CIMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRMDX and CIMDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HRMDX	CIMDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	0.17	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.12	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.42	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between HRMDX and CIMDX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison

HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than CIMDX's 3.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund	2.09%	2.17%	5.93%	1.93%	5.45%	23.95%	0.44%	2.26%	9.68%	6.60%	0.69%	1.80%
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	3.41%	3.24%	0.45%	1.62%	6.38%	0.44%	0.91%	3.32%	2.27%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and CIMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRMDX	CIMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-31.86%	-10.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.44%	-11.30%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.89%	-21.26%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.85%	-8.41%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-5.88%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	3.60%	+0.28%

Volatility

HRMDX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 4.65%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRMDX	CIMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.29%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	11.49%	-1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	18.72%	-0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	15.81%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	17.52%	+1.90%