HRMDX vs. 100D.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L).
HRMDX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Oct 31, 2014. 100D.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021.
Performance
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.35% | 0.12% | 3.68% | 13.37% | -3.09% | 28.13% | 6.93% | 6.71% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 1.83% | 35.26% | 7.50% | 13.03% | -6.40% | 16.93% | -9.08% | 5.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
HRMDX is traded in USD, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRMDX achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 1.83% return.
HRMDX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
100D.L
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRMDX vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank
HRMDX
100D.L
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRMDX | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 1.55 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.34 | 1.95 | -1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.96 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 8.84 | -8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRMDX | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.55 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRMDX and 100D.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison
HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than 100D.L's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.12% | 2.17% | 5.93% | 1.93% | 5.45% | 23.95% | 0.44% | 2.26% | 9.68% | 6.60% | 0.69% | 1.80% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.65% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, roughly equal to the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and 100D.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRMDX | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -34.63% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.44% | -11.10% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -13.06% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -6.26% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -4.71% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.55% | +1.29% |
Volatility
HRMDX vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 4.13%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRMDX | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 6.16% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 16.51% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 16.54% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 19.35% | +0.07% |