HRMDX vs. HRTVX
HRMDX (Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund) and HRTVX (Heartland Value Fund) are both mutual funds - HRMDX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Heartland, while HRTVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Heartland. Over the past 10 years, HRMDX returned 10.19%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for HRTVX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HRMDX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for HRTVX.
Performance
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRMDX achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than HRTVX's 21.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HRMDX has underperformed HRTVX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while HRTVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
HRMDX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
HRTVX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 21.79%
- 6M
- 20.20%
- 1Y
- 40.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 11.97% | 0.12% | 3.68% | 13.37% | -3.09% | 28.13% | 6.93% | 25.30% | -8.58% | 8.14% |
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 21.79% | 15.94% | 15.76% | 17.15% | -10.04% | 21.86% | 13.12% | 17.93% | -12.10% | 8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRMDX and HRTVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HRMDX and HRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRMDX vs. HRTVX — Risk / Return Rank
HRMDX
HRTVX
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HRMDX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.42 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 4.46 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 15.34 | -11.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum HRTVX drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and HRTVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRMDX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -61.68% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -9.50% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -23.17% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -23.17% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | -46.31% | +3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | 0.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -9.03% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.76% | +0.48% |
Volatility
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 3.42%, while Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRMDX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.86% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 11.96% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 17.11% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 19.51% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 21.05% | -1.64% |
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HRTVX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HRMDX vs. HRTVX - Dividend Comparison
HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than HRTVX's 7.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.94% | 2.17% | 5.93% | 1.93% | 5.45% | 23.95% | 0.44% | 2.26% | 9.68% | 6.60% | 0.69% | 1.80% |
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 7.63% | 9.29% | 8.91% | 5.65% | 3.01% | 13.50% | 0.76% | 3.12% | 7.26% | 6.43% | 3.56% | 8.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HRMDX and HRTVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRTVX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to HRMDX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRMDX dropped -42.61% vs HRTVX's -61.68%.
HRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRMDX and HRTVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer