PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 22.94% return.


HQU.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
22.05%
YTD
41.30%
6M
36.32%
1Y
81.34%
3Y*
46.99%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
33.31%

QQQM

1D
0.21%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.94%
6M
19.29%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
30.39%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
41.30%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%12.20%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
22.94%15.31%36.48%51.60%-27.71%26.30%3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and QQQM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.90

The correlation between HQU.TO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HQU.TO
QQQM

Technology

52.7%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.0%
4.2%

Industrials

3.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.1%

Technology

HQU.TO
52.7%
QQQM
53.8%

Communication Services

HQU.TO
15.2%
QQQM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HQU.TO
14.3%
QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

HQU.TO
5.5%
QQQM
7.7%

Healthcare

HQU.TO
5.0%
QQQM
4.2%

Industrials

HQU.TO
3.5%
QQQM
2.8%

Basic Materials

HQU.TO
1.3%
QQQM
1.1%

Utilities

HQU.TO
1.2%
QQQM
1.4%

Energy

HQU.TO
0.6%
QQQM
0.6%

Financial Services

HQU.TO
0.5%
QQQM
0.2%

Real Estate

HQU.TO
0.2%
QQQM
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TOQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.50

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.59

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

11.44

-0.24

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TOQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.82

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.05

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.97

-0.91

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TOQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-31.71%

-64.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-12.27%

-13.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

-22.52%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

-31.71%

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-7.58%

-47.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

3.84%

+3.70%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.41%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TOQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

4.41%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.33%

11.79%

+12.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

15.61%

+16.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

20.58%

+24.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.87%

20.48%

+24.39%

Dividends

HQU.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

HQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQU.TO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer