HQU.TO vs. QCAP
HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past year, HQU.TO returned 81.34% vs 12.49% for QCAP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while QCAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QCAP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than QCAP's 6.57% return.
HQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 22.05%
- YTD
- 41.30%
- 6M
- 36.32%
- 1Y
- 81.34%
- 3Y*
- 46.99%
- 5Y*
- 23.89%
- 10Y*
- 33.31%
QCAP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 12.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 41.30% | 26.77% | 38.38% |
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 6.57% | 2.22% | 15.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HQU.TO and QCAP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HQU.TO and QCAP has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQU.TO vs. QCAP — Risk / Return Rank
HQU.TO
QCAP
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQU.TO | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 4.44 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 14.02 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQU.TO | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.54 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 1.26 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than QCAP's maximum drawdown of -10.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and QCAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQU.TO | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.76% | -10.72% | -85.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -2.83% | -23.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.29% | -1.54% | -53.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 0.90% | +6.64% |
Volatility
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) at 1.15%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HQU.TO | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 1.15% | +8.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.33% | 3.73% | +20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.85% | 4.95% | +26.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.90% | 9.32% | +35.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.87% | 9.32% | +35.55% |
Dividends
HQU.TO vs. QCAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither HQU.TO nor QCAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HQU.TO and QCAP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest.
Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and QCAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer