PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQGO vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HQGO vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HQGO vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
-4.85%15.15%25.09%6.12%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.98%11.27%20.27%6.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -5.98% return.


HQGO

1D
0.76%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-4.85%
6M
-3.46%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCLR

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-5.17%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HQGO vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HQGO vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQGO
HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQGO vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQGOQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.95

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.14

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

4.57

+1.38

HQGO vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQGO and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQGOQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.95

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.55

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and QCLR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HQGO vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than QCLR's 15.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
0.53%0.51%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.83%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLR drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and QCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HQGOQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-21.77%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-10.22%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-8.10%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-6.32%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.56%

+0.39%

Volatility

HQGO vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.93%. This indicates that HQGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HQGOQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

3.93%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

8.56%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.92%

12.08%

+7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

12.61%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

12.61%

+4.69%