HQGO vs. IOO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HQGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HQGO returned 19.76% vs 26.03% for IOO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HQGO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.

Performance

HQGO vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 9.63% return.

HQGO

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 7.64%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 1Y: 19.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IOO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 8.23%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 15.48%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQGO vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	8.83%	15.15%	25.09%	5.10%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	9.63%	27.02%	26.54%	3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and IOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.91

The correlation between HQGO and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

HQGO vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HQGO	IOO
Technology	42.1%	45.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	7.9%
Communication Services	13.1%	10.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	9.1%
Industrials	6.1%	5.2%
Financial Services	6.0%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	5.8%
Energy	3.6%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.6%	0.2%
Utilities	0.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

HQGO vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQGO

HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 52
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 69
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQGO vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HQGO	IOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.82	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.52	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	2.63	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	10.17	-2.78

HQGO vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQGO and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and IOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HQGO	IOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.85%	-55.85%	+35.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-9.94%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-3.64%	+1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-11.23%	+8.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.57%	+0.11%

Volatility

HQGO vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is 3.72%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that HQGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HQGO	IOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	4.12%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	11.75%	-0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.01%	14.39%	-0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	17.19%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	17.70%	-0.76%

HQGO vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HQGO vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IOO's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.85%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HQGO and IOO in my portfolio?

HQGO and IOO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HQGO or IOO?

IOO has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to HQGO (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQGO dropped -20.85% vs IOO's -55.85%.

Which ETF is better, HQGO or IOO?

On 1-year performance, IOO leads with 26.03% vs 19.76% for HQGO. On fees, HQGO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, HQGO has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HQGO or IOO?

Over the 1-year period, IOO has performed better with a 26.03% return vs 19.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HQGO or IOO?

HQGO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HQGO or IOO?

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.46% for HQGO.

What is the main difference between HQGO and IOO?

HQGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. HQGO tracks Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.40% for IOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.