HQGO vs. HMOP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP).

HQGO and HMOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HQGO is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 5, 2023. HMOP is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Dec 13, 2017.

Performance

HQGO vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HQGO vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	-4.85%	15.15%	25.09%	6.12%
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF	0.18%	4.70%	2.52%	1.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than HMOP's 0.18% return.

HQGO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -4.85%
• 6M: -3.46%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HMOP

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQGO vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than HMOP's 0.29% expense ratio.

HQGO

Hartford US Quality Growth ETF

HMOP

Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

HQGO vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQGO

HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 49
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

HMOP

HMOP Risk / Return Rank: 57
HMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
HMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQGO vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HQGO	HMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.18	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.54	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.25	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.50	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	4.90	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HQGO vs. HMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the HMOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQGO and HMOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HQGO	HMOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.18	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.61	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and HMOP is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HQGO vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than HMOP's 3.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	0.53%	0.51%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF	3.50%	3.40%	3.22%	2.92%	2.12%	1.67%	5.26%	2.87%	2.27%

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, which is greater than HMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and HMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HQGO	HMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.85%	-13.12%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-3.10%	-9.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.95%	-2.10%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-2.49%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	0.95%	+2.00%

Volatility

HQGO vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison

Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) at 1.09%. This indicates that HQGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HQGO	HMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	1.09%	+4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	1.80%	+9.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.92%	3.74%	+16.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	3.85%	+13.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.30%	4.29%	+13.01%