HQGO vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HQGO is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HQGO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

HQGO vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 31.48% return.

HQGO

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: 7.82%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 24.74%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQGO vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	9.84%	-0.30%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	31.48%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and GARY is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

HQGO vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQGO

HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 55
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQGO vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HQGO	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	—	—

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HQGO	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.85%	-10.28%	-10.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-4.17%	+3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.88%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HQGO	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	21.79%	-7.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	21.79%	-4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	21.79%	-4.83%

HQGO vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

HQGO vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HQGO and GARY in my portfolio?

HQGO and GARY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HQGO or GARY?

On fees, HQGO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HQGO or GARY?

HQGO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HQGO or GARY?

HQGO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between HQGO and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.77% for GARY.