HQGO vs. DLN
HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HQGO tracks the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HQGO returned 25.94% vs 22.38% for DLN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HQGO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
HQGO vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HQGO having a 10.17% return and DLN slightly lower at 9.93%.
HQGO
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
HQGO vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 10.17% | 15.15% | 25.09% | 6.12% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HQGO and DLN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between HQGO and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
HQGO vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HQGO
DLN
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
HQGO
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
HQGO
DLN
Communication Services
HQGO
DLN
Healthcare
HQGO
DLN
Industrials
HQGO
DLN
Financial Services
HQGO
DLN
Consumer Defensive
HQGO
DLN
Energy
HQGO
DLN
Basic Materials
HQGO
DLN
Real Estate
HQGO
DLN
Utilities
HQGO
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQGO vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
HQGO
DLN
HQGO vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQGO | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.46 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.69 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 15.59 | -5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQGO | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.53 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.53 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
HQGO vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQGO | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -57.84% | +36.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -6.10% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.51% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -7.52% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.44% | +1.07% |
Volatility
HQGO vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that HQGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HQGO | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.17% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 6.77% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 8.87% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.26% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.16% | +0.83% |
HQGO vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
HQGO vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HQGO and DLN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HQGO has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQGO dropped -20.85% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 1-year performance, HQGO leads with 25.94% vs 22.38% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HQGO has performed better with a 25.94% return vs 22.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.46% for HQGO.
HQGO tracks Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HQGO and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer