PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPQ vs. BAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HPQ vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HP Inc. (HPQ) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPQ achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HPQ has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 10.09%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.


HPQ

1D
-2.74%
1M
19.48%
YTD
16.67%
6M
1.52%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
10.09%

BAC

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.95%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
0.86%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
25.68%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPQ vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HPQ
HP Inc.
16.67%-28.69%12.10%16.08%-26.40%57.25%24.11%3.88%-0.20%45.69%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
-1.06%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HPQ and BAC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1986

0.36

The correlation between HPQ and BAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HPQ:

$23.66B

BAC:

$399.28B

EPS

HPQ:

$2.72

BAC:

$4.19

PE Ratio

HPQ:

9.42

BAC:

12.84

PS Ratio

HPQ:

0.42

BAC:

2.33

PB Ratio

HPQ:

6.11

BAC:

1.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

HPQ:

$57.42B

BAC:

$174.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HPQ:

$11.61B

BAC:

$110.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

HPQ:

$3.83B

BAC:

$41.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPQ vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPQ
HPQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPQ vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HP Inc. (HPQ) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPQBACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.38

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

3.56

-3.13

HPQ vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPQ and BAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPQBACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.15

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.26

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.55

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.20

+0.03

Drawdowns

HPQ vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPQ drawdown since its inception was -85.19%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPQ and BAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPQBACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.19%

-93.10%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.62%

-17.93%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.23%

-27.51%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.23%

-46.64%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.23%

-48.95%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.34%

-4.95%

-25.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-28.31%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.52%

6.94%

+13.58%

Volatility

HPQ vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

HP Inc. (HPQ) has a higher volatility of 23.89% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.79%. This indicates that HPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPQBACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.89%

6.79%

+17.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.20%

16.35%

+15.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.17%

21.54%

+18.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.78%

26.88%

+8.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

30.70%

+4.57%

Dividends

HPQ vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

HPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than BAC's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.56%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
HPQ
HP Inc.
4.61%5.24%3.42%3.53%3.77%2.21%2.94%3.20%2.83%2.56%3.40%129.70%

Financials

HPQ vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HP Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
14.41B
30.27B
(HPQ) Total Revenue
(BAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HPQ vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HP Inc. and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
20.9%
95.6%
Portfolio components
HPQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.02B and revenue of 14.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.

HPQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported an operating income of 612.00M and revenue of 14.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.

HPQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported a net income of 450.00M and revenue of 14.41B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HPQ and BAC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HPQ has higher volatility (23.89%) compared to BAC (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPQ dropped -85.19% vs BAC's -93.10%.

BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPQ and BAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer