HPP vs. BABA
HPP (Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. HPP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HPP returned -22.17%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for BABA. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HPP vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPP achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HPP has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -22.17%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.48% annualized return.
HPP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -18.57%
- 6M
- 59.74%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- -18.38%
- 3Y*
- -28.97%
- 5Y*
- -38.87%
- 10Y*
- -22.17%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.03%
BABA
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- 27.16%
- 6M
- -27.24%
- YTD
- -15.83%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- -7.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13B | $1.37B | $1.51B | |
| $9.73M | $10.48M | $14.09M |
HPP vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 27.15% | -48.94% | -66.86% | 1.86% | -57.88% | 6.79% | -33.40% | 33.35% | -12.49% | 1.41% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -15.83% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPP and BABA is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HPP and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HPP:
$746.91M
BABA:
$293.02B
HPP:
-$9.30
BABA:
CN¥33.85
HPP:
0.98
BABA:
2.45
HPP:
0.36
BABA:
1.89
HPP:
$814.50M
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
HPP:
$237.04M
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
HPP:
-$33.73M
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPP vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
HPP
BABA
HPP vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPP | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.05 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.05 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 0.09 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPP vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPP drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPP and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPP | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -80.09% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.36% | -49.47% | -24.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.71% | -49.47% | -42.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.83% | -68.54% | -28.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.44% | -80.09% | -17.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.61% | -59.04% | -34.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.52% | -37.84% | +7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.03% | 24.79% | +20.24% |
Volatility
HPP vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) have volatilities of 13.89% and 14.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPP | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 14.17% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.20% | 29.11% | +26.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.19% | 45.09% | +22.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.03% | 51.60% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.97% | 43.64% | +4.33% |
Dividends
HPP vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
HPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.86% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.30% | 4.03% | 10.28% | 4.05% | 4.16% | 2.66% | 3.44% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.04% |
Financials
HPP vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HPP vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
HPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of -81.12M and revenue of 181.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -44.6%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
HPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.94M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
HPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a net income of -48.04M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in a net margin of -26.4%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HPP and BABA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (14.17%) compared to HPP (13.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPP dropped -97.44% vs BABA's -80.09%.
BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HPP and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer