HPP vs. JNJ
HPP (Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. HPP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, HPP returned -20.36%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HPP vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPP achieves a 32.96% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HPP has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of -20.36%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.
HPP
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 28.23%
- YTD
- 32.96%
- 6M
- 40.35%
- 1Y
- -26.53%
- 3Y*
- -19.93%
- 5Y*
- -38.70%
- 10Y*
- -20.36%
JNJ
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 61.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
HPP vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 32.96% | -48.94% | -66.86% | 1.86% | -57.88% | 6.79% | -33.40% | 33.35% | -12.49% | 1.41% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 16.81% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPP and JNJ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.21 |
The correlation between HPP and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HPP:
$928.25M
JNJ:
$584.60B
HPP:
-$10.62
JNJ:
$8.65
HPP:
0.90
JNJ:
6.04
HPP:
0.37
JNJ:
7.20
HPP:
$814.50M
JNJ:
$96.36B
HPP:
$237.04M
JNJ:
$66.60B
HPP:
-$33.73M
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPP vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
HPP
JNJ
HPP vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.64 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 5.68 | -6.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 16.53 | -17.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPP vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPP drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPP and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -50.67% | -46.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.36% | -10.96% | -63.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.71% | -15.95% | -75.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.83% | -18.41% | -78.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.44% | -27.37% | -70.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.32% | -3.26% | -90.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.10% | -11.90% | -18.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.11% | 3.76% | +40.35% |
Volatility
HPP vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) has a higher volatility of 20.75% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 7.05%. This indicates that HPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.75% | 7.05% | +13.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.76% | 12.69% | +42.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.87% | 17.40% | +48.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 16.99% | +41.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.73% | 18.54% | +29.19% |
Dividends
HPP vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
HPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.30% | 4.03% | 10.28% | 4.05% | 4.16% | 2.66% | 3.44% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.04% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.19% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
HPP vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HPP vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
HPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of -81.12M and revenue of 181.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -44.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
HPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.94M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
HPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a net income of -48.04M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in a net margin of -26.4%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HPP and JNJ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HPP has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to JNJ (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPP dropped -97.44% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HPP and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer