HPP vs. JNJ
HPP (Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. HPP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, HPP returned -22.17%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for JNJ. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HPP vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPP achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 25.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HPP has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of -22.17%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
HPP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -18.57%
- 6M
- 59.74%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- -18.38%
- 3Y*
- -28.97%
- 5Y*
- -38.87%
- 10Y*
- -22.17%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.03%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- YTD
- 25.25%
- 1Y
- 57.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.73M | $10.48M | $14.09M | |
| $2.09B | $2.09B | $1.99B |
HPP vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 27.15% | -48.94% | -66.86% | 1.86% | -57.88% | 6.79% | -33.40% | 33.35% | -12.49% | 1.41% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 25.25% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPP and JNJ is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.21 |
The correlation between HPP and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HPP:
$746.91M
JNJ:
$617.78B
HPP:
-$9.30
JNJ:
$8.63
HPP:
0.98
JNJ:
6.38
HPP:
0.36
JNJ:
7.36
HPP:
$814.50M
JNJ:
$97.93B
HPP:
$237.04M
JNJ:
$68.99B
HPP:
-$33.73M
JNJ:
$31.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPP vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
HPP
JNJ
HPP vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.56 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 5.46 | -5.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 15.18 | -15.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPP vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPP drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPP and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -50.67% | -46.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.36% | -10.96% | -63.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.71% | -15.72% | -75.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.83% | -18.41% | -78.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.44% | -27.37% | -70.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.61% | -4.07% | -89.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.52% | -11.88% | -18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.03% | 3.93% | +41.10% |
Volatility
HPP vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 8.48%. This indicates that HPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPP | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 8.48% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.20% | 15.03% | +40.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.19% | 18.44% | +48.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.03% | 17.46% | +41.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.97% | 18.75% | +29.22% |
Dividends
HPP vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
HPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.30% | 4.03% | 10.28% | 4.05% | 4.16% | 2.66% | 3.44% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.04% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.04% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
HPP vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HPP vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
HPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of -81.12M and revenue of 181.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -44.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 18.50B and revenue of 25.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.
HPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.94M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 7.17B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
HPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. reported a net income of -48.04M and revenue of 181.85M, resulting in a net margin of -26.4%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.53B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HPP and JNJ have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HPP has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to JNJ (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPP dropped -97.44% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HPP and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer