PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPP vs. BCAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HPP vs. BCAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPP achieves a 34.26% return, which is significantly higher than BCAB's -87.25% return.


HPP

1D
-0.55%
1M
29.47%
YTD
34.26%
6M
41.72%
1Y
-26.60%
3Y*
-19.67%
5Y*
-38.56%
10Y*
-20.28%

BCAB

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
-87.25%
6M
-90.93%
1Y
-81.96%
3Y*
-72.55%
5Y*
-71.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPP vs. BCAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HPP
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
34.26%-48.94%-66.86%1.86%-57.88%6.79%-6.07%
BCAB
BioAtla, Inc.
-87.25%-3.97%-75.97%-70.18%-57.97%-42.28%11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HPP and BCAB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020

0.19

The correlation between HPP and BCAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HPP:

-$10.62

BCAB:

-$1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

HPP:

$814.50M

BCAB:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

HPP:

$237.04M

BCAB:

-$12.46M

EBITDA (TTM)

HPP:

-$33.73M

BCAB:

-$67.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPP vs. BCAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPP
HPP Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BCAB
BCAB Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BCAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPP vs. BCAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPPBCABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.90

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.87

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-1.33

+0.73

HPP vs. BCAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the BCAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPP and BCAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPP vs. BCAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPP drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, roughly equal to the maximum BCAB drawdown of -99.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPP and BCAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPPBCABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.44%

-99.91%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.36%

-94.57%

+20.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.71%

-98.31%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.83%

-99.85%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.26%

-99.90%

+6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.08%

-84.84%

+54.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.07%

61.49%

-17.42%

Volatility

HPP vs. BCAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) is 20.70%, while BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) has a volatility of 22.89%. This indicates that HPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPPBCABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.70%

22.89%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.19%

101.19%

-46.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.99%

133.67%

-67.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.70%

118.50%

-59.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.73%

115.06%

-67.33%

Dividends

HPP vs. BCAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPP nor BCAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAB
BioAtla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HPP
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
0.00%0.00%3.30%4.03%10.28%4.05%4.16%2.66%3.44%2.92%2.30%2.04%

Financials

HPP vs. BCAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and BioAtla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
181.85M
0
(HPP) Total Revenue
(BCAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HPP and BCAB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAB has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to HPP (20.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPP dropped -97.44% vs BCAB's -99.91%.

HPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPP and BCAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer