HOOY vs. METW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HOOY (YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF) and METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index. HOOY is actively managed, while METW is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOY returned -3.54% vs -11.12% for METW. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for METW.

Performance

HOOY vs. METW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -3.91% return, which is significantly lower than METW's -2.29% return.

HOOY

• 1D: -6.94%
• 1M: 6.70%
• 6M: -3.10%
• YTD: -3.91%
• 1Y: -3.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METW

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 12.30%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 1Y: -11.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOY vs. METW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF	-3.91%	30.16%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-2.29%	-9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOY and METW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

HOOY vs. METW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOY

HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 10
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 7
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOY vs. METW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOY	METW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	-0.24	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	-0.04	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.99	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	-0.28	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	-0.50	+0.38

HOOY vs. METW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOY Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the METW Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOY and METW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOY vs. METW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than METW's maximum drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and METW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOY	METW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.54%	-40.52%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.54%	-40.52%	-11.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.40%	-22.47%	-5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.11%	-18.77%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.12%	22.42%	+7.70%

Volatility

HOOY vs. METW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) is 16.16%, while Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) has a volatility of 18.87%. This indicates that HOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOY	METW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.16%	18.87%	-2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.54%	37.21%	+6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.45%	46.05%	+10.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.51%	45.04%	+9.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.51%	45.04%	+9.47%

HOOY vs. METW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than METW's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOY vs. METW - Dividend Comparison

HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 142.29%, more than METW's 53.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF	142.29%	82.87%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	53.86%	30.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOY and METW in my portfolio?

HOOY and METW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOY or METW?

METW has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to HOOY (16.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs METW's -40.52%.

Which ETF is better, HOOY or METW?

On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with -3.54% vs -11.12% for METW. On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HOOY has been the lower-risk option at 16.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOY or METW?

Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a -3.54% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOY or METW?

METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOY or METW?

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 142.29%, compared with 53.86% for METW.

What is the main difference between HOOY and METW?

HOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while METW is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOY and 0.59% for METW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.