PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOY vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -26.79% return.


HOOY

1D
-2.53%
1M
27.13%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
-10.93%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CONY

1D
-3.16%
1M
-11.77%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-30.97%
1Y
-49.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOY and CONY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.71

The correlation between HOOY and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOYCONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.86

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.78

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

-1.24

+1.91

HOOY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOYCONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.54%

-63.57%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.54%

-63.39%

+11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.28%

-58.53%

+28.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.76%

-22.83%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.31%

39.89%

-10.58%

Volatility

HOOY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a higher volatility of 18.25% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 15.74%. This indicates that HOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOYCONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.25%

15.74%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.06%

44.42%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.26%

57.79%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.47%

59.89%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.47%

59.89%

-5.42%

HOOY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

HOOY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 148.68%, less than CONY's 204.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
204.97%192.07%155.66%16.43%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
148.68%82.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOY and CONY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (18.25%) compared to CONY (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs CONY's -63.57%.

On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with 19.41% vs -49.52% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a 19.41% return vs -49.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 204.97%, compared with 148.68% for HOOY.

HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOY and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer