HOOY vs. HOOW
HOOY (YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOY returned -20.08% vs -29.77% for HOOW. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
HOOY vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -19.64% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -31.68% return.
HOOY
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- -12.88%
- 6M
- -13.19%
- YTD
- -19.64%
- 1Y
- -20.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.35%
HOOW
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -17.10%
- 6M
- -21.51%
- YTD
- -31.68%
- 1Y
- -29.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.83M | $5.59M | $5.41M | |
| $4.72M | $4.93M | $3.98M |
HOOY vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF | -19.64% | 30.16% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -31.68% | 52.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOY and HOOW is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.99 |
The correlation between HOOY and HOOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOY vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
HOOY
HOOW
HOOY vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.45 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | -0.74 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOY vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.54% | -65.74% | +14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.54% | -65.74% | +14.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.12% | -53.60% | +13.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.52% | -31.07% | +9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.85% | 40.37% | -9.52% |
Volatility
HOOY vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) is 16.47%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 23.66%. This indicates that HOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.47% | 23.66% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 65.51% | -21.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.16% | 85.04% | -27.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 83.89% | -29.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 83.89% | -29.23% |
HOOY vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HOOY and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
HOOY vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 149.65%, less than HOOW's 167.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 167.55% | 67.92% |
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF | 149.65% | 82.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, HOOY and HOOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HOOW has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to HOOY (16.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs HOOW's -65.74%.
On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with -20.08% vs -29.77% for HOOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, HOOY has been the lower-risk option at 16.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a -20.08% return vs -29.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOY and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 167.55%, compared with 149.65% for HOOY.
HOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
HOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOY and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer