HOOY vs. LFGY

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

HOOY (YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOY returned 16.41% vs 7.54% for LFGY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

HOOY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -13.15% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.83% return.

HOOY

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 14.61%
• YTD: -13.15%
• 6M: -15.59%
• 1Y: 16.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFGY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF	-13.15%	67.41%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	14.83%	5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOY and LFGY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025	0.74

The correlation between HOOY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOOY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOY

HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 14
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 12
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOY	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	0.15	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	0.47	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.06	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	0.16	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	0.34	+0.16

HOOY vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOY and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOY	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.54%	-35.94%	-15.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.54%	-35.94%	-15.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.28%	-12.29%	-22.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-14.02%	-6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.94%	16.57%	+12.37%

Volatility

HOOY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) at 14.01%. This indicates that HOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOY	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.45%	14.01%	+3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.40%	31.82%	+10.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.83%	38.34%	+17.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.40%	42.48%	+11.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.40%	42.48%	+11.92%

HOOY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

HOOY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 155.65%, more than LFGY's 82.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF	155.65%	82.87%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.27%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOY and LFGY in my portfolio?

HOOY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOY or LFGY?

HOOY has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to LFGY (14.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, HOOY or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with 16.41% vs 7.54% for LFGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 14.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOY or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOY or LFGY?

HOOY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOY or LFGY?

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 155.65%, compared with 82.27% for LFGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.