PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -35.42% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.


HOOX

1D
-3.78%
1M
32.61%
6M
-39.46%
YTD
-35.42%
1Y
-36.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
1.92%
1M
18.08%
6M
14.43%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
120.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and WNTR is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.57

The correlation between HOOX and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOXWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

2.84

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

7.31

-7.93

HOOX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-42.65%

-44.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

-42.65%

-44.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.10%

-10.15%

-59.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-20.53%

-19.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.47%

16.58%

+41.89%

Volatility

HOOX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 38.19% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.84%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.19%

18.84%

+19.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.74%

47.46%

+57.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.67%

53.83%

+84.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.48%

53.56%

+89.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.48%

53.56%

+89.92%

HOOX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOX has higher volatility (38.19%) compared to WNTR (18.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs -36.63% for HOOX. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs -36.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 21.87% for HOOX.

HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer