HOOX vs. SGDJ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while SGDJ is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. HOOX is actively managed, while SGDJ is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -36.63% vs 57.97% for SGDJ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.

Performance

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -35.42% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's -11.67% return.

HOOX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: 32.61%
• 6M: -39.46%
• YTD: -35.42%
• 1Y: -36.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGDJ

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -6.35%
• 6M: -19.49%
• YTD: -11.67%
• 1Y: 57.97%
• 3Y*: 41.71%
• 5Y*: 15.51%
• 10Y*: 7.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	-35.42%	342.84%
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	-11.67%	116.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and SGDJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.21

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOOX	SGDJ
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HOOX vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX

HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SGDJ

SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 37
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOX	SGDJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	1.12	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	1.56	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.21	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	1.58	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	3.61	-4.23

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than SGDJ's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and SGDJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOX	SGDJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.11%	-59.27%	-27.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.11%	-36.84%	-50.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.10%	-35.60%	-34.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.22%	-26.29%	-13.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.47%	16.12%	+42.35%

Volatility

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 38.19% compared to Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) at 17.35%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOX	SGDJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.19%	17.35%	+20.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	104.74%	42.61%	+62.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.67%	51.94%	+86.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.48%	41.16%	+102.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.48%	41.00%	+102.48%

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOX vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, more than SGDJ's 9.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	21.87%	14.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	9.48%	8.37%	6.55%	4.55%	2.46%	2.20%	1.97%	0.65%	0.00%	0.14%	1.77%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOX and SGDJ in my portfolio?

HOOX and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOX or SGDJ?

HOOX has higher volatility (38.19%) compared to SGDJ (17.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, HOOX or SGDJ?

On 1-year performance, SGDJ leads with 57.97% vs -36.63% for HOOX. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 17.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOX or SGDJ?

Over the 1-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 57.97% return vs -36.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOX or SGDJ?

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOX or SGDJ?

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 21.87%, compared with 9.48% for SGDJ.

What is the main difference between HOOX and SGDJ?

HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SGDJ is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.50% for SGDJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.