HOOX vs. NVDG
HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -31.77% vs 83.14% for NVDG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
HOOX vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 18.93% return.
HOOX
- 1D
- -12.45%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- -60.76%
- 6M
- -72.98%
- 1Y
- -31.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDG
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 83.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOX vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | -60.76% | 312.21% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.93% | 99.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOX and NVDG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HOOX and NVDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOX vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
HOOX
NVDG
HOOX vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOX | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.96 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 4.44 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOX | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 1.24 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.40 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
HOOX vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOX | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.11% | -66.19% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.11% | -42.72% | -44.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.84% | -18.34% | -63.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.46% | -23.07% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.44% | 18.77% | +34.67% |
Volatility
HOOX vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) at 25.14%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOX | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.73% | 25.14% | +16.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.05% | 50.15% | +50.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.62% | 67.81% | +69.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 90.72% | +53.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 90.72% | +53.36% |
HOOX vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOX vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, more than NVDG's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | 35.99% | 14.12% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.93% | 11.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOX and NVDG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to NVDG (25.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 25.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.
HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 9.93% for NVDG.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.75% for NVDG.
NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOX and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer