HOOX vs. IFED
HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOX is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -31.77% vs 1.97% for IFED. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
HOOX vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.52% return.
HOOX
- 1D
- -12.45%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- -60.76%
- 6M
- -72.98%
- 1Y
- -31.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOX vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | -60.76% | 312.21% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOX and IFED is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOX vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
HOOX
IFED
HOOX vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.14 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 0.34 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 0.12 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.65 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
HOOX vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.11% | -22.36% | -64.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.11% | -14.65% | -72.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.84% | -5.50% | -76.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.46% | -5.84% | -31.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.44% | 5.75% | +47.69% |
Volatility
HOOX vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.50%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.73% | 4.50% | +37.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.05% | 12.86% | +88.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.62% | 16.21% | +121.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 19.88% | +124.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 19.88% | +124.20% |
HOOX vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOX vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | 35.99% | 14.12% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOX and IFED have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 1-year performance, IFED leads with 1.97% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFED has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.
HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOX and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer