HOOW vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned 2.30% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

HOOW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 20.63%
• 6M: -12.98%
• YTD: -8.58%
• 1Y: 2.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-8.58%	52.60%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	79.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and WNTR is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.60

The correlation between HOOW and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	2.26	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	2.47	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.34	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	2.84	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	7.31	-7.25

HOOW vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-42.65%	-23.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	-42.65%	-23.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.92%	-10.15%	-27.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.43%	-20.53%	-9.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.11%	16.58%	+22.53%

Volatility

HOOW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 22.96% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.84%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.96%	18.84%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.57%	47.46%	+16.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.72%	53.83%	+29.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.81%	53.56%	+30.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.81%	53.56%	+30.25%

HOOW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.72%, more than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	131.72%	67.92%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and WNTR in my portfolio?

HOOW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOW or WNTR?

HOOW has higher volatility (22.96%) compared to WNTR (18.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 2.30% for HOOW. On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOW or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or WNTR?

HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or WNTR?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 131.72%, compared with 102.14% for WNTR.

What is the main difference between HOOW and WNTR?

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.