HOOW vs. XBTY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while XBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned -24.25% vs -44.39% for XBTY. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

HOOW vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -31.68% return, which is significantly lower than XBTY's -22.50% return.

HOOW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -27.79%
• 6M: -20.03%
• YTD: -31.68%
• 1Y: -24.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.81%

XBTY

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: -16.67%
• YTD: -22.50%
• 1Y: -44.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -33.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	$4.69M	$5.55M	$5.41M
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	$70.68K	$100.72K	$240.24K

HOOW vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-31.68%	52.60%
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	-22.50%	-23.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and XBTY is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.52

The correlation between HOOW and XBTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 8
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

XBTY

XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 0
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOW vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	XBTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	-1.76	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	-2.75	+2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.68	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.97	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	-1.35	+0.68

HOOW vs. XBTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the XBTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and XBTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than XBTY's maximum drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and XBTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	XBTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-49.03%	-16.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	-49.03%	-16.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.60%	-47.49%	-6.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-26.13%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.51%	34.99%	+5.52%

Volatility

HOOW vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 21.12% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 2.14%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	XBTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.12%	2.14%	+18.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.47%	13.90%	+51.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.98%	26.92%	+58.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.74%	26.42%	+57.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.74%	26.42%	+57.32%

HOOW vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOW and XBTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

HOOW vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 167.55%, less than XBTY's 201.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	167.55%	67.92%
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	192.49%	102.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and XBTY in my portfolio?

HOOW and XBTY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOW or XBTY?

HOOW has higher volatility (21.12%) compared to XBTY (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs XBTY's -49.03%.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or XBTY?

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with -24.25% vs -44.39% for XBTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOW or XBTY?

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a -24.25% return vs -44.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or XBTY?

HOOW and XBTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or XBTY?

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 192.49%, compared with 167.55% for HOOW.

What is the main difference between HOOW and XBTY?

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XBTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.