HOOW vs. SPUU
HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOW is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned -6.96% vs 38.38% for SPUU. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
HOOW vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 18.22% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- -9.53%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 1Y
- -6.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 1Y
- 38.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.84%
HOOW vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -12.18% | 52.60% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 18.22% | 27.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and SPUU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HOOW and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
HOOW vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOOW
SPUU
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HOOW
SPUU
Basic Materials
HOOW
-
SPUU
Communication Services
HOOW
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
HOOW
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
HOOW
-
SPUU
Energy
HOOW
-
SPUU
Healthcare
HOOW
-
SPUU
Industrials
HOOW
-
SPUU
Real Estate
HOOW
-
SPUU
Technology
HOOW
-
SPUU
Utilities
HOOW
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
SPUU
HOOW vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOW | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.12 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 8.78 | -8.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -59.35% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.74% | -18.19% | -47.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.36% | -2.59% | -37.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.49% | -9.45% | -21.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.31% | 4.38% | +34.93% |
Volatility
HOOW vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 24.01% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 6.85%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.01% | 6.85% | +17.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.40% | 20.13% | +44.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.21% | 25.27% | +58.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.98% | 33.69% | +50.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.98% | 35.75% | +48.23% |
HOOW vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOW vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.11%, more than SPUU's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 133.11% | 67.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOW and SPUU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOW has higher volatility (24.01%) compared to SPUU (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 38.38% vs -6.96% for HOOW. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 38.38% return vs -6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 133.11%, compared with 1.33% for SPUU.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.60% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOW and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer